🔗 Share this article

Established political parties are more and more enabling the radical right to set the public discourse, as per a new research carried out in Germany.

Academics found that this trend has inadvertently benefited radical groups by validating their ideas and disseminating them more widely.

Study Drawing from Over 20 Years of Media Coverage

The findings, published in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an automated text analysis of over 520,000 news pieces from six German newspapers.

Capital-based scholars noted that as the radical faction moved from fringe issues in the 1990s era to central themes like assimilation and immigration, mainstream political groups progressively adjusted their communication in response.

This adjustment boosted the spread of these ideas and signaled to voters that such stances were acceptable.

Consequences for Democracy

"Public communication by mainstream political groups is crucial in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a expert in political behavior involved in the research.

"This factor has been overlooked," she added.

The effect was evident even when conventional groups were criticising the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the researcher commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is crucial."

Mainstreaming Effect Throughout the Continent

While the research was focused on Germany, this normalisation effect is likely to affect nations across the European continent.

"You see this a lot in European news outlets," said another researcher. "The far right says something and everyone begins discussing it for several days."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Hardening of Political Discourse

At times, leaders have also toughened their discourse to match that of the radical right.

In a recently published discussion, a then German chancellor advocated widespread expulsions and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable instances can be found across Europe, as politicians from countries including the UK to France embrace the rhetoric of the far right, especially on migration.

This has created an echo chamber that would have been unthinkable a decade ago.

Core Issue: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are discussing societal topics – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the pace of the far right, that's the whole idea of agenda setting," explained a study author.

Some parties have taken additional measures, seeking to copy the strict platform of the far right, despite research suggests that doing so drives voters to cast their ballot for the far right.

Progressive Impact and Voter Awareness

The scope of information gathered revealed that the influence of far-right parties had been gradual and had grown with the passage of time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from one day to another," stated a co-author. "But if you hear this pessimistic narrative around immigration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by far-right parties but also, for instance, by mainstream parties, then of course this narrative travels further."

Need for Established Parties to Carve Out Their Distinct Discourses

The study emphasized the necessity for mainstream political parties to develop their own discourses, especially on topics such as immigration and assimilation, rather than continuously trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," said one researcher. "When the leader is far-right and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be playing."