🔗 Share this article

Based on a new review, scores of personnel with experience in the fossil fuel field have been positioned within the existing administration, comprising more than 40 who formerly been employed directly for oil corporations.

Overview of the Study

The analysis analyzed the profiles of nominees and appointees serving in the White House and multiple national agencies responsible for environmental regulation. Those encompass key organizations including the EPA, the Interior Department, and the energy office.

Wider Administrative Climate

This report comes during ongoing initiatives to roll back environmental regulations and alternative energy supports. As an example, new acts have opened large areas of public territory for drilling and phased out funding for renewable power.

Amid the firehose of terrible developments that have happened on the ecological side... it’s crucial to inform the citizens that these are not just actions from the nebulous, ginormous thing that is the leadership broadly, said one researcher involved in the analysis. It is frequently particular individuals with ties to certain powerful sectors that are carrying out this disastrous deregulatory program.

Major Findings

Analysts discovered 111 staff whom they classified as energy sector veterans and alternative energy adversaries. This covers 43 people who were directly working by coal firms. Among them are prominent top executives including the top energy official, who previously worked as top executive of a hydraulic fracturing company.

The list also contains lesser-known government members. For example, the department overseeing renewable energy is managed by a previous gas manager. Similarly, a top energy counsel in the administration has held senior roles at large petroleum firms.

Additional Ties

An additional 12 personnel possess connections to industry-backed rightwing policy organizations. Those include ex- employees and researchers of entities that have actively opposed alternative sources and advocated the expansion of traditional energy.

Moreover 29 other staff are ex- industry leaders from manufacturing fields whose activities are closely connected to energy resources. Additional officials have relationships with energy companies that market conventional power or government leaders who have advocated pro-coal initiatives.

Departmental Concentration

Researchers found that 32 employees at the interior agency alone have ties to fossil fuel sectors, making it the most heavily influenced government department. This features the head of the office, who has consistently accepted oil support and acted as a bridge between fossil fuel business donors and the administration.

Political Finance

Oil and gas contributors provided significant funds to the campaign initiative and swearing-in. After assuming power, the leadership has not only implemented pro-fossil fuel rules but also created benefits and exceptions that benefit the field.

Experience Questions

Alongside oil-tied nominees, the researchers identified multiple White House higher-ups who were appointed to influential jobs with scant or no pertinent knowledge.

These people may not be tied to the energy sector so closely, but their unfamiliarity is problematic, remarked a co-author. It is logical to think they will be compliant, or vulnerable targets, for the fossil fuel objectives.

For example, the candidate to lead the environmental agency’s department of legal affairs has very little court experience, having not ever argued a lawsuit to verdict, not taken a deposition, and nor presented a legal request.

In a separate example, a executive assistant working on energy policy came to the position after serving in jobs disconnected to the industry, with no clear direct field or regulatory expertise.

White House Response

One spokesperson for the executive branch dismissed the findings, saying that the leadership’s appointees are exceptionally qualified to deliver on the public’s directive to boost American fuel output.

Historical and Present Environment

The government enacted a significant array of pro-industry measures during its first period. In its present tenure, backed with pro-business plans, it has overseen a much more extensive and stricter rollback on environmental policies and clean power.

There is no shame, commented one expert. The administration is eager and prepared to go out there and tout the fact that they are doing assistance for the oil and gas sector, extractive industry, the energy industry.