🔗 Share this article

No fewer than eleven jurisdictions and two territories have agreed to a new directive from the federal government to remove mentions of transgender issues and the existence of trans and non-binary people from a federal sex education initiative, authorities stated.

The government set a Monday deadline for stripping these references, warning the withdrawal of millions in federal funds. Almost every of the complying states have GOP-led lawmaking bodies and predominantly Republican state leaders.

Legal Challenges and Financial Disputes

Sixteen other states and Washington DC have initiated legal action challenging the government's requirement, claiming it infringes on legislative power, which created the $75 million sexual health initiative, known as the Personal Responsibility Education Program (Prep).

All jurisdictions participating in the lawsuit are governed by Democratic governors.

In a recent court order, a U.S. judge prevented the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which oversees the program, from withholding funding to the suing jurisdictions if they refuse to comply.

“HHS fails to show that the new grant conditions are reasonable, nor does it offer any valid reason, other than pretext, for its decisions,” stated the judge, a federal jurist in Oregon. “HHS provides no evidence that it made informed determinations or took into account the statutory objectives.”

Initiative Aims and Government Scrutiny

Prep aims to inform teenagers on positive interactions and how to avoid pregnancy and the transmission of STIs.

In April, the federal government demanded all states and territories obtaining program money to provide a version of their curriculum to HHS and its subsidiary, the ACF office, for a health content assessment.

By late summer, the administration sent letters to 46 states and territories, informing them that, during the review, it had discovered “material in the curricula that fall outside the purview of the program's legal framework.”

Specifically, the government said it had uncovered evidence of “gender ideology,” a term often used by conservative groups to describe the notion that gender is a fluid social construct and that transgender individuals exist.

Specific Examples of Requested Changes

The government instructed one state to drop a curriculum that stated: “Young people may express themselves in ways that differ from their assigned gender.”

It instructed North Carolina to delete a line from a middle school lesson that read: “People of all sexual orientations and gender identities need to know how to avoid pregnancy and STDs.”

Moreover, health instructors in many jurisdictions could no longer be instructed to “demonstrate acceptance and respect for all students, regardless of personal characteristics, including race, heritage, religion, social class, sexual orientation or gender identity,” according to the notices sent to jurisdictions.

Government Comments and State Responses

“Oversight is imminent,” said Andrew Gradison, acting assistant secretary of the ACF office, in a statement. “Government money will not be used to negatively influence of the next generation or promote dangerous ideological agendas.”

Several jurisdictions and territories confirmed they would eliminate the content or had completed the process. These consist of eleven specific states, as well as the two territories.

Two other states, Alabama and South Dakota, reported their educational programs never included the terminology referenced in the government's notices.

Effects on Adolescents and Mental Health

Together, these jurisdictions are home to over 120,000 trans people between the ages of 13 and 17, based on projections from a research institute.

“When the aim is to help adolescents and give them a secure environment, I’m not sure why we are targeting the at-risk teenagers in the population,” commented an advocate, who heads Rise that provides sex education in Tennessee.

“When the government says that there’s something wrong with you and the educators aren’t allowed to provide information or they have to disclose your identity to family – when you know that that’s not safe – that’s horrible for mental health.”

Nearly half of trans and non-binary youth contemplated self-harm in the previous twelve months, according to a recent study from a mental health organization. School support for these youths is linked to reduced numbers of attempted suicide, the group discovered.

Previous Actions and Ongoing Disputes

Previously, the Trump administration instructed California to remove mentions to transgender topics from its educational program.

When the jurisdiction refused, the government revoked its Prep grant, eliminating approximately $12m in federal funding and stopping health initiatives in schools, juvenile detention facilities and care facilities.

The California health department is challenging the withdrawal. To date, it has been unsuccessful in make up for the lost funding.

The government has additionally informed instructors who obtain money from two other federal sex education initiatives, the $50m SRAE program and the $101 million Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program (TPPP), that they may not teach about “gender-related concepts.”

An early October court order prevented the administration from changing TPPP, while the Monday court order stops it from changing SRAE in the suing jurisdictions that challenged the initiative.

The Administration for Children and Families did not immediately respond to a request for comment.